Jose Martinez v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The defendant appeals an order denying his Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence, in which he challenged a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed under the 10-20-Life law. More than a decade after his conviction and sentence, he claims the mandatory minimum sentence was illegal.because the information failed to expressly allege he had “actual possession” of a firearm, thereby failing to provide him sufficient notice that the firearm enhancement would apply. We disagree and affirm.
The State charged the defendant with robbery while carrying a firearm. A jury convicted him as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Altieri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Arnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jose Martinez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
- Rolling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Isaac J. Nelson, III v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- ALLOY LEWIN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- ISSAC WOODS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.