Legal Opinion

Jose Martinez v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 2015No. 4D14-2076PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant appeals an order denying his Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence, in which he challenged a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed under the 10-20-Life law. More than a decade after his conviction and sentence, he claims the mandatory minimum sentence was illegal.because the information failed to expressly allege he had “actual possession” of a firearm, thereby failing to provide him sufficient notice that the firearm enhancement would apply. We disagree and affirm.

The State charged the defendant with robbery while carrying a firearm. A jury convicted him as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Altieri v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  5. Arnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jose Martinez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Rolling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Isaac J. Nelson, III v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. ALLOY LEWIN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  5. ISSAC WOODS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API