Legal Opinion

Krenek v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 7, 1925No. 8989Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

As we understand the record, appellant was indicted on January 9, 1924, and his case set for trial February 20th. Of this he became aware on January 11th. When the case was called on February 20th, it was, upon his application because of the absence of the witness, Dr. W. R. Newton, continued and reset for the 26th of March. It appears from the record that Dr. Newton was a resident physician of the county; that he had not been subpoenaed; that he was temporarily absent from the county, in the city of Chicago, to which point he had started on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Albertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API