Legal Opinion
Allen v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 18, 2003No. 03-330PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.
This case involves the propriety of sanctions assessed by Circuit Judge Keith Rutledge, who was serving by appointment, against attorney Tom Allen under Rule 11 of Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial judge ordered Allen to pay five hundred dollars ($500.00) to the opposing party. Allen is an attorney in Batesville and has presented various cases before Judge Rutledge, namely Cynthia Lavigne v. Kenneth Lavigne (Independence County Cir. PR-2002-251-4) and Greenway v. Swaims (Independence County Cir. CIV-2001-530-4) and was counsel in both cases. We take…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of RicklefsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- L.W. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Allen v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- In Re The Marriage Of Scott L. Ricklefs And Cheryl A. Ricklefs Upon The Petition Of Scott L. RicklefsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- W.H. v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021