Legal Opinion
State v. Cox
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 2012No. 2011-KA-0670PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.
| Appellant Brett Cox is before this Court seeking to have his guilty pleas vacated on the grounds that all of the evidence against him was illegally seized and thus should have been suppressed. For the reasons discussed below we affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On March 4, 2010, the defendant was charged with one count of violating La. R.S. 14:95 E, possession of a firearm while in the possession of marijuana, and one count of violating La. R.S. 40:967(F), possession of more than twenty-eight, but less than two-hundred, grams of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Pumphrey v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- State v. CallahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. EllisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. PatinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. GarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. HillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.