Legal Opinion

Winsor v. Winsor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1908No. 15,549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.

1Per curiam

There was testimony which tended quite strongly to show that the deed from George H. Winsor to his son Frank, although absolute in form, was a mortgage given to secure a debt of $300, and that A. D. Winsor, another son, to whom Frank conveyed the farm after their father’s death, knew the facts and circumstances when he took the conveyance. There was evidence that the last time the father left the place, which was less than three weeks prior to his death, he went to Frank and demanded that the farm be deeded back to him, and that Frank told him it would not be done until the $300 which he owed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Dyer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Stratton v. RotrockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Duncan v. EssarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API