Legal Opinion

Gunst v. Goldstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Issues of law upon demurrer to the complaint. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

To a complaint proceeding for penalties under the. provisions of the Stock Corporation Law (General Law, chap. 38, §■ 29) in consequence of the defendant’s refusal to exhibit to the plaintiff the stock book and “ stock certificate book ” of a domestic corporation, a demurrer is interposed on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and (2).that there is a defect of parties defendant in that the J. M. Gunst Disinfecting Company has not been made a party defendant. During the period in suit the plaintiff was the president of the last-mentioned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Village of Cortland v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Morehouse v. CrilleyNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seydel v. Corp. Liquidating Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API