In Re Request for Opinion of the Supreme Court Relative to Constitutionality of SDLC
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Dissent
I would respectfully decline to grant Governor Janklow’s request. His request belongs in the legislative arena and should not be answered by this Court. We, in the *828judicial branch, owe a constitutional duty not to simply accommodate the executive branch of government, but, rather, to check on it. Separate but equal. That is the watchword. We need not “accommodate” requests from the Governor’s office for legal opinions. This Court has historically spurned ex parte opinions where the rights of private parties (a) exist or (b) could later be involved.
QUESTION ONE
As concerns the first question,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Opinion of the JudgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Holland v. Yankton School District 63-3South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In re House Resolution No. 30South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- In re Opinion of the JudgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- In re Chapter 6, Session Laws of 1890South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.