Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Morgan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff and the defendants George Whitney and Guaranty Trust Company, who are the only defendants served in the action, move for summary judgment upon the same papers, and both state there are no controverted questions of fact.

*638This action was originally brought by Elias Hackner, G. J. Bowman and Lees Ballinger for themselves and others similarly situated as former holders -of five' year <5% gold notes of the Van Sweringen Corporation (here called the “Company”) against the same defendants, for the same relief as now asked.' An appeal was taken from an order…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Irving Trust Co. v. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API