Legal Opinion

Coin MacHine Acceptance Corp. v. Folsom

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1949No. 32379Published

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

Upon consideration of the written conditional-sales contract being foreclosed, it appears to be a complete and valid contract and there is no allegation that there was any fraud, accident, or mistake. In these circumstances it will be conclusively presumed that the writing contains the entire agreement and parol evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements is inadmissible to add to, take from, or vary the written instrument. West v. Miller, 32 Ga. App. 199 (1) (122 S. E. 809). The opening paragraph of the conditional-sales contract provides; “The undersigned seller hereby sells, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dyar v. Walton, Whann & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Armistead v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Curtis v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Shinall Bros. v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. West v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API