Legal Opinion

in Re Michael Sutton

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided April 24, 2008No. 02-08-00154-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-154-CV IN RE MICHAEL SUTTON RELATOR ------------ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ------------ The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2 Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue. PER CURIAM PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and HOLMAN, J. DELIVERED: April 24, 2008 1 … See T EX. R. A PP. P. 47.4. 2 … See Wentworth v. Meyer,

839…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wentworth v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Rose v. City of La PorteTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. City of La Porte v. State ex rel. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API