Legal Opinion
United States v. Frederick Hogan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 2, 2012No. 10-1456UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Frederick Arnold Hogan, D.O., appeals the judgment in his criminal case after he pled guilty to distributing Oxycontin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). Defendant argues that the district court committed numerous reversible errors relating to his conviction and sentence.
For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the conviction and sentence imposed by the district court.
BACKGROUND
In 2003, the Michigan State Police Southwest Enforcement Team (“SWET”) investigated Defendant Dr. Frederick Hogan’s (“Dr. Hogan”) Non-Invasive Pain Management Clinic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Tony RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Joe HeadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Rocky HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Cory BuckholzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Dylan QuandtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Misty AngelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.