Legal Opinion

Rivers v. Standard & Poor's Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 31, 1991No. 90 Civ. 0057 (PKL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

LEISURE, District Judge:

This is an action alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the New York Human Rights Law (“Human Rights Law”), Executive Law § 290 et seq. Defendant Standard & Poor’s Corporation has now moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), for judgment on the pleadings, or, in the alternative, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for partial summary judgment.1

*55 Background

Plaintiff Donald Rivers was employed by defendant Standard & Poor’s Corporation as a General Manager in the Consulting Department in New York. In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mark Labounty v. Stephen G. Adler, E. Carrillo, Walter A. Burdge, J. Grigioni, and All Program Committee MembersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Giuntoli v. Garvin Guybutler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Kirkland v. City of PeekskillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Adames v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  5. Realmuto v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langford v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 30District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API