Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Cary
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Peoceeding on petition of legatee to compel an accounting and payment of legacy.
1Opinion of the Court
Davie, S.
The will of decedent was admitted to probate "by the Surrogate’s Court of Cattaraugus county, August 16, 1907, and letters testamentary issued on the same day to Frank Rumsey and Emma C. Rumsey, the executors therein named. The executors are husband and wife, she being a daughter and he a son-in-law of the decedent. No judicial settlement or intermediate accounting has been had.
By the terms of the will decedent made provision for his widow, now deceased, bequeathed to each of the executors, $20,000, to their son, Charles Cary Rumsey, $8,000 to be paid to him upon his becoming…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Estate of WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Schuehle v. . ReimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Cooke v. . State National Bank of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Groshon v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Rogers v. KingNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WolfNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WatersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of KentNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Mutual Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1920
- In re the Estate of HigginsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913