Claim of Sickles v. Ballston Refrigerating Storage Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the Ballston Refrigerating Storage Company and another from an award of the State Industrial Commission made on the 28th day of July, 1915.
1Opinion of the Court
Cochrane, J.:
The Commission has found that the employer, the Ballston Refrigerating Storage Company, was “ engaged in the business of handling and storing fruits and produce at Ballston Spa, New York,” and that the claimant “was employed as a purchasing and sales agent and assistant to the manager by the Ballston Refrigerating Storage Company.” These findings are in accordance with the facts. The employer conducted a storage business at Ballston Spa, N. Y., and to that extent was engaged in a hazardous employment as described in section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kramer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Claim of Mandel v. A. Steinhardt & Bro., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Leslie v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Claim of Wincheski v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- In re BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.