Legal Opinion

Tanck v. Tanck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-2468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s determination in all respects but one. Based on the disparity of the incomes and financial positions of the parties, we determine that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to order the husband to pay 100 percent of the wife’s attorney’s fees and costs. We, therefore, reverse that portion of the final judgment, and direct that the husband be required to pay all of the wife’s attorney’s fees and costs.

We also would again remind the trial court that it is inappropriate for the trial court to chastise and doggedly question a party as to issues adequately…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nicholson v. NicholsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rossi v. GarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Mowe v. MoweDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API