Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 2000No. 99-5153Published

1DissentJustice Scalia

I agree with Parts I and II of the Court’s opinion, and thus, like the Court, believe that the case ultimately turns on the meaning of 18 U. S. C. § 3583(e)(3) (1988 ed., Supp. V). I do not agree, however, with the Court’s interpretation of that provision. The section provides that when the conditions of supervised release are violated, the court may “revoke a term of supervised release, and require the person to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release without credit for time previously served on postrelease supervision.” Finding in this an authorization for imposition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API