Hart v. Deshong
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
This case does not primarily concern itself with such form of acknowledgment of an antecedent debt as will remove the bar of the Statute of Limitations. It rather has to do with the effect of a payment of goods on account of such antecedent debt. The two matters, however, are so closely connected that a logical discussion of the latter seems to require some consideration of the former.
At early common law time constituted no bar to an action for the enforcement of a legal right and Statutes of Limitations had their origin in 1623 in the Statute of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Gillingham v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Windsor v. HearnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1932
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sorensen v. the Overland CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
- Joslin v. GregoryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Riffle v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Snyder v. Baltimore Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
- Levin v. Diamond State Poultry Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.