Conley v. Daughters of the Republic
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
We do not deem it necessary to discuss at length the objection of the plaintiffs in error’s counsel to the jurisdiction of the district court. It is sufficient to say that the facts do not bring the case within the terms of this article of the Revised Statutes of 1911: “Art. 5732 (4861). No court of this state [except the Supreme Court, as provided by article 1526] shall have power, authority or jurisdiction to issue the writ of mandamus or injunction or any other mandamus or compulsory writ of process against any of the officers of the executive departments of the government of this state to…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Charles Scribner's Sons v. S.M.N. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- State of Texas v. EppersonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Slater v. Ellis County Levee Improvement District No. 9Texas Supreme Court · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.