Legal Opinion

Cleveland Campers, Inc. v. R. Thad McCormack, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 3, 2006No. A06A0889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Cleveland Campers, Inc. (“CCI”), and its sole owners, H. V. and Wilda Rohr, filed the underlying action asserting claims of legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against closing attorney Raymond T. McCormack and his law firm, R. Thad McCormack, PC., arising out of the sale of CCI to Marilyn Ballard and Happy Time RV Sales & Service (“Happy Time”). The trial court granted McCormack’s motion for summary judgment, finding that no attorney-client relationship existed between the Rohrs and McCormack. The Rohrs appeal. For reasons explained below, we affirm.

1. Prior to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guillebeau v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Dyer v. HoneaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Calhoun v. TapleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Legacy Homes, Inc. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Mays v. AskinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Interest of C. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Mosera v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Stewart v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. Barker v. WBY, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
  5. Fitzpatrick v. HarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API