Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Gibson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1980No. 2-278A43PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Presiding Judge.

Appellant plaintiff Duane Jackson appeals from the entry of judgment in favor of appellee defendant Earl Gibson. We affirm.

Duane Jackson was employed by Sun Realty Company, Inc. as a custodian. He was injured while performing his duties as custodian at a building owned by Earl Gibson. Earl Gibson was also the sole shareholder of Sun Realty and the president, resident agent and manager of the corporation. There is no dispute that the injury resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Therefore, the Workmen’s Compensation Act was applicable.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. SchubertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Constance Kottis, as Administratrix of the Estate of Christos Kottis v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Witherspoon v. SalmIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Needham v. Fred's Frozen Foods, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Witherspoon v. SalmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Skinner v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Clem v. Steveco, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. González Rivera v. Multiventas y Servicios, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
  5. Henderson v. Meredith Lumber Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API