Legal Opinion
Fort Worth Lloyds v. Hale
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 27, 1966No. 7630PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENTON, Chief Justice.
This is a suit by J. P. Hale and wife Beulah Hale to recover against Fort Worth Lloyds for the loss of merchandise and fixtures under the provisions of two fire insurance policies. The trial court, with a jury, entered judgment for the plaintiff below and the defendant insurance carrier has perfected this appeal.
Appellees were the owners of a variety store in O’Donnell, Texas. It is undisputed the two fire insurance policies issued by appellant were in full force and effect on February 2, 1964, the date of the fire; that the two policies provided combined coverage of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Crane v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Maresca v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Goforth v. AlveyTexas Supreme Court · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth Lloyd's Insurance Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Chamberlain v. Cherry, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1991
- Ben Rogers v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Milton Bell and Mansard Homes Co., Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Narro Warehouse, Inc. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Benham v. Benham, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.