Legal Opinion

DeWees v. Alsip

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1977No. 6552PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OSBORN, Justice.

This case involves a promissory note and a contract for the sale of a partnership business which were executed simultaneously. The trial Court denied recovery on the note and we affirm.

In the Plaintiff’s original petition, Richard DeWees sued C. E. Luna and H. J. A1 Alsip alleging that the Defendants executed and delivered to Plaintiff their promissory note in the sum of $23,100.00, with an unpaid balance due on the note in the sum of $18,550.00. The suit also sought recovery of interest and attorney’s fees as provided in the note. The note was attached to the petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Unit, Inc. v. Ten Eyck-Shaw, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Johnson v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Goddard MacHinery Co. v. Industrial Equipment Repairs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Scott Irrigation Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  2. Wauson & Williams, Architects, Inc. v. Reeder Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Chapin & Chapin, Inc. v. Texas Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Cooper v. Scott Irrigation Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  5. Cooper v. Scott Irrigation Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API