Legal Opinion

Arp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1934No. 16190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It is recited in the transcript that appellant entered into recognizance after notice of appeal was given. The recognizance is not brought forward in the transcript. When the accused is enlarged, this court is without jurisdiction in the absence of a proper recognizance or appeal bond. Hudgins v. State,36 S.W.2d 488.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hudgins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Heaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API