Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 4, 1971No. 50716Published

1DissentDixon, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal, 235 So.2d 631 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1970). The rationale of the majority holding of this court is an attempted distinction between a contract of indemnity on the one hand, and a contract of liability insurance on the other. Yet, a Louisiana statute defines “insurance” as “a contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay a specified amount upon determinable contingencies.” Louisiana Revised Statutes 22:5(1). And Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary (1965) defines insurance as “coverage by a contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API