Legal Opinion

Dreiling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1980No. 50,987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Defendant State Farm Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the trial court awarding plaintiff Leslie O. Dreiling personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under the Kansas automobile injury reparations act (K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 40-3101 et seq.).

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in awarding PIP benefits to plaintiff, who was injured while operating a borrowed automobile, but who, at the time of the accident, owned a registered, uninsured and inoperable automobile.

The facts are as follows. In 1976,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farm & City Insurance v. American Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Tapscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Ward v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Malen v. American States Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merritt v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  2. Bradley v. AID Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Lara v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  4. Hernandez v. Guaranty National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. Morris v. American Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API