Legal Opinion

Varnell v. Union Carbide

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1989No. CA 89-26Published

1ConcurrenceJudith Rogers, Judge

I concur in the result and decision of the court as it is both a correct statement and clarification of the law at the present time. I am concerned, however, that the burden of proof is such that it erects an almost impossible barrier for the employer to overcome to establish that such payments were intended as advance payment of compensation. Consequently, I am concerned that injured employees will not receive needed funds since payments may be withheld pending final adjudication. The employers may fear that the payments will subsequently not be credited as advance payments of compensation.

2DissentJames R. Cooper, Judge

I…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Maloney, Inc. v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DisheroonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. SieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Brooks v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Looney v. Sears RoebuckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API