Legal Opinion

Drain v. Covenant Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1998No. 0084 Middle District Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Policyholders of Covenant Life Insurance Company sued Covenant, its directors, and Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company after the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner approved a merger of Covenant and Provident in 1994. Jurisdiction and standing issues are currently before the Court. The trial court held that it has no jurisdiction over this action and that the policyholders lack standing to pursue their claims. The Superior Court reversed on both issues. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

Covenant Life Insurance Company primarily focused its business on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Cuker v. MikalauskasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Rowen v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Garber v. LegoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. American Housing Trust, III v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Werbowsky v. CollombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Warden v. McLellandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Ciamaichelo v. Independence Blue CrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Geruschat v. Ernst & Young, LLP (In Re Earned Capital Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. LaFarge Corp. v. Com., Ins. Dept.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API