McNeill v. Minter
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the conclusion of law of the trial judge that “[t]he plaintiff was damaged by defendant’s deceit and conversion of real property to the extent and in the amount of $650.00, with six (6%) percent interest thereon from June 25,1968.” The assignment of error must be sustained.
“Conversion” is defined as “an unauthorized assumption and exercise of the right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or the exclusion of an owner’s rights.” (Emphasis ours.) Wall v. Colvard, Inc., 268 N.C. 43, 149…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peed v. Burleson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Wall v. Colvard, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Eadus v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Graner v. HogsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Silverman v. Miller (In Re Silverman)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Tai Sports, Inc. v. HallNorth Carolina Business Court · 2012
- United States v. GaskinsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.