Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Bauer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hurray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

This was a suit in equity, brought, by appellee Bauer, to foreclose a mortgage. Appellant Kinney being a necessary party was made one of the defendants to the bill. Being a non-resident of the State, the only service of process was by publication, and the clerk mailing to him in the State of Ohio, a copy of the notice. His default was entered and such proceedings were had, that a decree of foreclosure, etc., passed April 25, 1878. Kinney filed his petition under the statute, duly verified, alleging that he did not receive the notice mailed to him, and praying to be heard touching the matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. . FitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Miller v. MetzgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Free Sons of Israel v. OhnsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Grannemann v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Greenys v. JonalisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API