Legal Opinion

City of Evansville v. Baumeyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1964No. 30,368Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Achor, C. J.

— Appellees assert first as ground for rehearing the fact that this court did not decide the merits of the case. In support of this position they cite the fact that it is the policy of this court to decide cases wherever possible on the merits. Miller, etc. v. Ortman, etc., et al. (1956), 235 Ind. 641, 650, 651, 136 N. E. 2d 17; Flanagan, Wiltrout & Hamilton’s Indiana Trial and Appellate *650Practice §2115, ch. 40, p. 4. However, as heretofore considered, the case was never before us on the merits. Therefore, despite the policy of this court to consider cases…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Guthrie v. HowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Royal Insurance v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Doughty v. State Department of Public WelfareIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Maley v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API