Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 1981No. 21528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to six (6) years’ imprisonment. We reverse.

At trial, over objection, the court limited appellant to five peremptory challenges to prospective jurors. She exhausted her five challenges before the jury selection was completed and did not try to assert a sixth peremptory strike.

By statute, one arraigned on a charge of grand larceny is “entitled to peremptory challenges not exceeding ten . . .” S. C. Code of Laws § 14-7-1110 (1976). We construe this language to mean a grand larceny defendant shall be allotted a full ten peremptory strikes.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. State v. LambertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ShortSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Anthony Green v. William D. Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Anthony Green v. William D. Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Anthony Green v. William D. Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API