Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Nobel v. Morchesky

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1982No. Civ. A. 78-836PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMMONS, District Judge.

This purported diversity action was brought July 28,1978, by Plaintiffs Sanford M. Nobel and Carol Nobel Hirsh, residents of New York State, trading as Menallen Coke Company of New Salem, as alleged owners of rights to certain coal, against the Pennsylvania Defendants the Estate of James A. Morchesky, Better Mining Company, Inc., and Charles and Mary Dahl, purported owners of surface rights to said coal, seeking damages and injunctive relief for the allegedly wrongful removal of certain coal from a tract of land situate in Fayette County, Pennsylvania.

A non jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Prudential Oil Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Carlsberg Resources Corporation v. Cambria Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Trent Realty Associates v. First Federal Savings And Loan Association Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. European-American Banking Corp. v. M/S ROSARIADistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nobel v. MorcheskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Conroy v. WinnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  3. Gordon-Maizel Construction Co. v. Leroy Productions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  4. Nobel v. MorcheskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Better Min. Co., Inc., Appeal OfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API