Fasterling v. Kahn

O’NIELL, O. J.

This is a suit to recover the value of 12 bonds of the Venice drainage district, of the value of $500 each, intrusted to the defendants as brokers, and not accounted for. The defense of'one of the defendants, Albrecht, was that there was no partnership between him and the other defendant, Kahn, and that the plaintiff’s dealings were with Kahn. As an alternative defense, Albrecht adopted the answer of Kahn, which was that Kahn had acquired the bonds from the plaintiff in exchange for 600 shares of stock in a corporation styled Prophytol Manufacturing Company, of the par value of…