Legal Opinion

Yude v. Cruise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying appellant’s application for a subpcena duces tecum directing the police department of the city of New York to produce at the trial of the action the records of the alleged accident which is the subject-in&tter of the suit, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (New York City Charter, §§ 893, 894; Hale v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 826.) Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, with the following memorandum: The subpoena duces tecum should issue. It is for the trial court to decide on the admissibility…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friedeberg v. HaffenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Hale v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Coleman, New York County Courts1973
  2. Scott v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Blaikie v. Borden Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API