Legal Opinion
Hawthorne v. Beam
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 11, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 83-134-NPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ joint motion to dismiss on the ground that this Court lacks the requisite subject matter jurisdiction to hear this action. The plaintiff has filed a brief in opposition to the motion. A hearing on the motion was held before this Court on March 7, 1983. The defendants’ motion is GRANTED, and the action is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED.
Asserting diversity of citizenship as the Court’s jurisdictional basis, the plaintiff has brought suit against Thomas Beam, a citizen of Indiana and against L. Wallace Sink,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- James L. Lester, Administrator of the Estate of Flossie Mae Garner Brown, Deceased v. Heyward McFaddon and Cameron Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Margaret M. Krier-Hawthorne v. Thomas L. Beam and L. Wallace Sink, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Krier, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Margaret M. Krier-Hawthorne v. Thomas L. Beam and L. Wallace Sink, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Krier, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984