Legal Opinion

Machacon v. Velda Farms Dairy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1994No. 92-2746Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Judge.

The claimant appeals a workers’ compensation order, contending that a greater attorney’s fee should have been awarded under section 440.34(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991). In computing the fee the judge declined to consider certain benefits, including the emergency MRI and Dr. Ennis’s authorization which were discussed in Machacon v. Velda Farms Dairy, 619 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Payment for the MRI and authorization of Ennis were not timely provided, and these benefits should have been included in the predicate for an attorney’s fee under section 440.34(3)(b). We therefore…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MacHacon v. Velda Farms DairyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API