Legal Opinion

Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Newhall v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1992No. 92-201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Appellant Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) appeals the trial court’s order which declines to enforce ap-pellee/father’s child support obligation, eliminates the father’s obligation to pay past due child support, and terminates the father’s obligation to pay future support. We reverse the trial court’s order and remand this matter for further proceedings.

In 1989 appellee was adjudicated to be the father of a dependent child and, pursuant to URESA, ordered to pay $108 per month in child support. See, generally, Chapter 88, Florida Statutes (1991). In 1991…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vecellio v. VecellioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Manning v. VargesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH REHABIL. SERV. v. CanadyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. FLA. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. CiferniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Guarino v. GuarinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Dept. of Revenue v. KiedaischDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Cortina v. LorieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Peterson v. MathiesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Department of Revenue v. WhitingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. DEPT. OF H & R SERV. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API