Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 1992No. 87-0074; CA A60607PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

This case is before us a second time. Defendant, a black man, was convicted of raping, ORS 163.375, and kidnapping, ORS 163.235, a white woman. During voir dire, the prosecutor exercised a peremptory challenge, thereby excusing DuBoise, the only black venireman. Defendant’s attorney objected and requested that a neutral reason be given. The trial court accepted the challenge as made, resulting in an all white jury. Defendant was convicted. On the first appeal, 94 Or App 87, 764 P2d 602, we held that defendant had made a prima facie showing under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 US 79, 96-97, 106 S Ct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bennett v. . GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API