Nichols v. Howell
New York Supreme Court
Motion to confirm the report of a referee in a proceeding to distribute the surplus arising from a sale in a mortgage foreclosure in the action above entitled.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
The fund in controversy arose upon the sale of property that was owned by the defendant Ira A. Howell.
The referee, appointed to determine the liens of the several above named claimants to the fund, has reported that Birddina Howell is first entitled to be paid therefrom the value of her inchoate right of dower in the mortgaged premises; that the claimant Alvah Armstrong is next to be paid his claim and that the remaining two claimants, .the Standard Oil Company of New York and the Bath National Bank are to be paid pro rata from the residue,- if there be any.
The two claimants, last above…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nutt v. . CumingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Sweet v. JacocksNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Cheney v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Terry v. FullerNew York Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sadow v. Poskin Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Warwick Savings Bank v. Long Island Chapter Knights of Columbus Social Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- In Re MizunoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Fishman v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Karchman v. KarchmanNew York Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.