Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Seeherman

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided November 12, 1935No. 83Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wickersham, J.,

The facts alleged in the first 10 paragraphs of defendant company’s petition are admitted by the Commonwealth and are substantially as follows:

On or about June 1, 1934, the defendant, Max Seeherman, was issued a permit to engage in business as a distributor of liquid fuels under the provisions of The Liquid Fuels Tax Act of May 21, 1931, P. L. 149, 72 PS §2611 (a.) et seq. Under the provisions of the aforesaid Liquid Fuels Tax Act the defendant, Seeherman, filed with the Department of Revenue a bond in the sum of $5,000 dated June 1, 1934, in which he joined as principal, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. United States v. WoodwardSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Duke v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Tenant v. TenantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Mifflin's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API