Legal Opinion
Robert Cushman Murphy v. Lloyd Butler, Area Supervisor, Etc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 28, 1960No. 662Published
1Opinion of the Court
362 U.S. 929
80 S.Ct. 750
4 L.Ed.2d 747
Robert Cushman MURPHY et al., petitioners,
v.
Lloyd BUTLER, Area Supervisor, etc., et al.
No. 662.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 28, 1960
Messrs. Roger Hinds and Frank C. Mebane, Jr., for petitioners.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Mr. Alan S. Rosenthal for respondent Butler.
Messrs. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, and Paxton Blair, Sol. Gen. for respondent Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets of State of New York.
The motion to substitute a party respondent is withdrawn pursuant to stipulation of counsel.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Robert Cushman Murphy v. Lloyd Butler, Area Supervisor, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Murphy v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
- Murphy v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958