Davis v. Broadalbin Knitting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, The Broadalbin Knitting Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the. clerk of the county of Fulton on the 18th day of February, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury for $1,200, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office tin the 13th day of February, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, J.:
The plaintiff was injured while in the employ of the defendant, and brings this -action to recover damages.
The complaint alleges the giving of a notice of the time, place and cause of the injuries to the plaintiff, in the manner and within the time provided by the Employers’ Liability Act (Laws¡of 1902, chap. 600), and that defendant was negligent in omitting its duty of seeing .that its “ways, works and machinery” were proper and in proper condition. There is a further allegation that the “ garnet machine,” by which plaintiff was injured, was insufficiently protected and was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Smith v. Lockwood & WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Woolsey v. Trustees of the Village of EllenvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Coyle v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chisholm v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Curran v. Manhattan Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Uss v. Crane Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Hill v. WeidingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Stern v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.