Legal Opinion

Landry v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 3, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3557PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

Petitioners have brought this special action to challenge the respondent court’s granting of a motion for a change of venue to Maricopa County. Since venue rulings are appropriately reviewable by special action, Bishop v. Marks, 117 Ariz. 50, 570 P.2d 821 (App.1977), we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

Petitioners had filed a complaint against the real parties in interest seeking injunctive relief and damages arising out of the serving of search warrants by officers of the Department of Public Safety, Pima County Sheriff’s office and the Tucson Police Department.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yamamoto v. Santa Cruz County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Bishop v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Rogers v. Board of Regents of the University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Backus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Morales v. Hon coffey/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API