Legal Opinion
B.E. Technology, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided July 12, 2013No. 2:12-cv-02781-JPM-cgcPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER
JON P. McCALLA, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Groupon, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Groupon”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed January 10, 2013. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons that follow, the Motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
This case concerns Defendant Groupon’s alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 6,628,314 (the “'314 patent”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff B.E. Technology, LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “B.E.”), is the assignee of the '314 patent (ECF No. 27 at 2), currently owning “all right, title, and interest in the '314…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- EdgePoint Capital Holdings, LLC v. Apothecare Pharmacy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- State of Arizona v. BidenDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Zarick v. DocVerify, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022