In re Vavoudis
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLydon, J.
The motion for reargument is granted, and, after consideration of all the papers now before me, the original determination granting the application for payment is adhered to.
Ordinarily, the bank would have become the owner of the check deposited and a debtor to its depositor for the amount of the deposit. But here the deposit slip bore the following provision: “All items credited shall be subject to actual receipt of final payment by this Bank, which shall not be held responsible for its delay or failure to present, collect or protest any item.” Manifestly, these provisions were inconsistent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Bank of CubaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bright v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Acken v. New York Title & Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1934
- In re MagedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Wolf v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Altmark v. Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.