Fischer v. Travelers' Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover on what is ordinarily denominated an “accident insurance policy.”
According to the facts as set out in the complaint, the insured, who was the husband of the plaintiff, “while peaceably, lawfully, and quietly engaged in his ordinary business as butcher, in his offfce at Mountain View, in said county of Santa Clara,” was shot through the body with a pistol, without provocation, by one George Langley, from w’hieh shot and wound thereby inflicted alone, Fischer, the insured, died in a few hours.
The complaint was demurred to as not…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Travelers Protective Ass'n v. FawcettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Continental Casualty Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Orr v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Barnett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. De LopezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.