Legal Opinion

Golden v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 23, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Response to Petitions for Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Overruling petitions.

In response to the petitions for a rehearing in these seven cases of Golden v. W. R. & Martha Lewis, Ison, Smith, Halcomb, J. J. Lewis and Martha Lewis, the opinions in which may be found in 176. Ky., pages 28 and 133, it is sufficient to say, in answer to the apprehension of counsel, that the rights of the Tennis Coal Co. and the Swift Coal & Timber Company may be prejudiced by what was said in these opinions, that the Tennis Coal Co. was not a party to any of the appeals, and the Swift Coal & Timber Co. was only a party appellee in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tarter, County Attorney v. PylesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API