Legal Opinion
Woosley v. Hi-Plains Harvestore, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 4, 1981No. CIV-80-109-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for damages for Defendants’ alleged violation of Plaintiff’s civil rights. There are two separate classes of plaintiffs: first, Jim and Marilyn Woosley and the Circle W., Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as Woosley); and secondly, Woosley’s Creditors. (Creditor Plaintiffs) Plaintiffs Woosley assert that Defendants conspired with Judge Merle Lansden 1 to deprive them of their property without due process of law in connection with a breach of contract action brought in the District Court of Cimarron…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Feldman v. Pioneer Petroleum, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Urbanizadora Altomar, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989