Legal Opinion

People v. Rivers

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1993No. E011383PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DABNEY, J.

A jury, convicted defendant and appellant Lee Rivers of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) 1 ; defendant having waived a jury on enhancement allegations, the court then found true the allegation that defendant had suffered a prior serious felony conviction within the meaning of section 667, subdivision (a). Defendant was sentenced to a total term of eight years, comprised of the three-year midterm for the robbery, and a five-year enhancement.

On this appeal, defendant argues that the CALJIC No. 2.21.2 impermissibly and prejudicially authorized the jury to believe testimony based only…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. People v. RuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API