Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Guntlow v. Barbera
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 19, 2010Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Kavanagh, J. (dissenting in part and concurring in part).
In our view, defendants Anthony Ryan and Anthony Battuello have established as a matter of law that they had probable cause to arrest plaintiff after being informed by four different individu*767ais that plaintiff, without provocation, struck Alisha Barbera with her hand while attending a concert at the Pepsi Arena.1 In addition, no evidence has been presented that these two City of Albany police officers acted with malice or mistreated plaintiff in any way after she was taken into custody and while she was being processed in connection…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. Ramirez-PortorealNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Martinez v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. ParrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. KetchamNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.